ure
OBY STEPHEN JERMANOK
One stroll searching for seashells on Gay
Head Beach as the sun splashes across
the multicolored clay cli s and you’ll
quickly understand why some American presidents want to spend their lone
summer holiday on Martha’s Vineyard.
The natural splendor extends out to sea,
where sailors tack in the distance and
fishermen throw out their lines to catch
their share of fighting stripers (striped
bass) and blues (bluefish). It only makes
sense that Vineyard locals would want
to preserve this beauty as they ardently
support conservation, sustainable
building, local farming and other eco-friendly initiatives.
Yet, of late, some people on the
island have made news with their small
but very vocal opposition to one of the
pillars of the green movement: wind
farms. The Cape Wind project would
generate some 75 percent of all the
energy used on Martha’s Vineyard,
Nantucket and the whole of Cape Cod.
Opponents question whether tourism,
boating, fishing and birding would be
a ected by the 130 giant turbines.
“Martha’s Vineyard is perceived as
a fairly liberal place, and a lot of people
who support other green issues and are
very passionate about the environment
don’t support Cape Wind,” says Beth
Daley, a science writer for The Boston
Globe, who’s been covering the Cape
Wind controversy since its inception
in 2001. “Most locals use the water
in a really fundamental way—either
for their livelihood, like fishing, or for
pleasure—and they feel that Nantucket
Sound is sacred ground that shouldn’t
be messed with by a private developer,”
she says.
For a green travel guide
to Martha’s Vineyard, visit
arrivemagazine.com and
click “Exclusive Content.”